Global warming is real


#2892

You produced absolutely nothing.


#2893

I produced just as much as you have.


#2894

Cut out the childish crap, you’ve produced absolutely noting and we both know it.


#2895

You produced a guy that says your right
I produced a guy that says your wrong


#2896

No I produced the source of the original claim. It had nothing to do with me being right or wrong about anything other than mentioning the site and it’s proposed age.

You folks want to argue the proposed age is incorrect so it’s up to you to show that it is.


#2897

He has produced no evidence that its correct.


#2898

And you can produce none to show it incorrect.


#2899

Don’t have to, the burden is on him.


#2900

Horse hockey, you make the claim it’s up to you to support it.


#2901

You made the claim that the site is 75,000 years old and have provided no evidence for that claim.

Not a single fact.

Just the word of a nutter.

You made a claim, you have to support it.


#2902

Have you found one fact based upon which you can challenge the date yet?

If so produce it.


#2903

No. Have you found one fact to support the date? Again, no.

Let’s make this real simple.

I don’t know how old the site is. You don’t know. Michael Tellinger definitely doesn’t know.

Is that fair? I think so.


#2904

You finally admitted it, Congratulations.

Now your obsession of the last two months can be put to rest.

I have no idea if he can prove it or not, I’m not going to sit through one of his idiotic lectures listening to all the Alien BS to get to that part of a presentation.

It’s just one of many similar ancient sites around the world that all point to a rather consistent orbit over the last 50-75k years or that where we may have had some significant changes, it returns pretty well to the same predicted and predictable path.

For whatever reason though you had to have have a multi month meltdown over it trolling the topic from thread to thread where I wasn’t even participating.

I’m not the one with issues here.


#2905

Admitted what?

You were the one claiming the site is 75,000 years old which remains completely unsubstantiated. It’s not out to rest until you admit this is entirely made up.

Are you going to do it?


#2906

I have no poof either way nor do you. I have never made any claims to the contrary.


#2907

The fact that there is no proof the date is correct, until you can provide some your screwed.


#2908

So you admit that there is no proof that its true, FINALLY!


#2909

I never made any claim that there was.


#2910

You have less than “no proof”. You have absolutely zero evidence whatsoever.

Which means your initial claim was fraudulent.


#2912

Cite a single post in this entire inane rant of yours where I have ever sated the date had bee absolutely established or even anything similar.